Blood Libel

Euro-Christian accounts of documented Jewish atrocities are a blood libel. Jewish accounts of alleged Euro-Christian atrocities are vanilla history.

----------------------------------

The coin-clippings, well poisonings, and ritual blood sacrifice constitute anti-Semitic "blood libel." Christians are guilty of *unprovoked* persecutions, pogroms, and expulsions! You might think that's an anti-Christian blood libel. It is not. That's just vanilla history.

-------------------------------

Jews claim they suffered at the hands of European Christians over the centuries--evidence, in Daily Wire editor Josh Hammer's words, that "Jew-hatred is inherent in the European DNA." When Christians counter with accounts of Jewish malfeasance--e.g., currency debasement, well poisonings, and ritual blood sacrifice--inciting backlash, Jews accuse them of perpetuating anti-Semitic "blood libel."

Got that? Christians stand perennially guilty of unprovoked persecutions, pogroms, and expulsions. You might think that's an anti-Christian blood libel. But it's not. That's just vanilla history.